RCRA Facility Investigation/Remedial Investigation

Table of Contents

Risk Assessments
Protection of Cultural and Biological Resources

In February 1996, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) entered into a voluntary agreement with the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)The department within the California Environmental Protection Agency in charge of the regulation of hazardous waste from generation to final disposal. DTSC oversees the investigation and cleanup of hazardous waste sites. to further investigate the nature and extent of contamination at the Topock Project Site (Site) resulting from Topock Compressor Station (Station) operations and to clean up related contamination. This agreement, the Corrective Action Consent AgreementA voluntary agreement between a lead agency and responsible party in which the company commits to investigate the nature and extent of contamination at and surrounding a site governed by RCRA, and to take corrective action., requires PG&E to follow an investigation and cleanup process governed by a federal law known as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)A 1976 amendment to the first federal solid waste legislation, the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1965. In RCRA, Congress established initial directives and guidelines for U.S. EPA to regulate and manage solid waste, including hazardous waste. RCRA established a regulatory system to track hazardous substances from the time of generation to final disposal. The law requires safe and secure procedures to be used in treating, transporting, storing and disposing of hazardous wastes. RCRA was designed to prevent new, uncontrolled hazardous waste sites..

In July 2005, PG&E entered into a voluntary Administrative Consent AgreementA legally binding contract between a lead agency and responsible party that serves to resolve an environmental violation through an administrative settlement agreement rather than through a court action. with the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI)The United States department charged with conservation and development of natural resources. The U.S. Department of the Interior uses sound science to manage and sustain America’s lands, water, wildlife, and energy resources, honors our nation’s responsibilities to tribal nations, and advocates for America’s island communities.. This Consent Agreement ensures compliance with federal requirements as set forth in Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)Commonly known as Superfund, this law created a tax on the chemical and petroleum industries and provided broad federal authority to respond directly to releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances that may endanger public health or the environment. CERCLA established prohibitions and requirements concerning closed and abandoned hazardous waste sites; provided for liability of persons responsible for releases of hazardous waste at these sites; and established a trust fund to provide for cleanup when no responsible party could be identified. The law authorizes two kinds of response actions: Short-term removals, where actions may be taken to address releases or threatened releases requiring prompt response. Long-term remedial response actions, that permanently and significantly reduce the dangers associated with releases or threats of releases of hazardous substances that are serious, but not immediately life threatening..

PG&E agreed to conduct a RCRA Facility Investigation/Remedial Investigation (RFI/RI)An investigation that occurs in the corrective action process following a Facility Assessment under RCRA and/or a Site Inspection under CERCLA. It is an in-depth study designed to gather data needed to determine the nature and extent of contamination at a site. to determine the extent of contamination and potential impacts to human health and the environment, and to gather information to support the evaluation and selection of remedies to address the contamination as necessary. RFI/RI data collection activities started in 1996. 

There have been multiple phases of investigation at the Site to collect data to evaluate the nature and extent of soil contamination at the Solid Waste Management Units, Areas of Concern, and Undesignated Areas. There are 15 soil investigation areas located outside the Station fence line (see figure below) and 27 soil investigation areas located inside the Station fence line (see figure below). The perimeter area outside of, but adjacent to, the Station fence line and the storm drain system are also being investigated as part of the soil investigation. 

Figure 1-2 Soil RFI/RI Work PlanFigure 1-3 Soil RFI/RI Work Plan

(Click on images above for larger view)

Top

Since some of the property affected by operations at the Station is owned and managed by the federal government, the DOI is overseeing remedial actions pursuant to CERCLA. Therefore, the RFI/RI reports have been prepared to satisfy both RCRA (as managed by DTSC) and CERCLA requirements.

Recent soil sampling and related Soil Investigation field work was completed between December 2015 and March 2016. That work fulfilled requirements of the Topock Soil Facility Investigation/Remedial Investigation (RFI/RI) Work Plan and Data Gap Work #1 and #2. Field work included:

  • Collection of soil samples at 319 locations.
  • Trenching of 10 locations to evaluate possible contamination.
  • Collection of sediment and pore water samples from 10 locations at the edge of the river by East Ravine.

After sample collection was completed, results were evaluated by DTSC, the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), and PG&E to determine if additional data collection is needed to complete the Soil Investigation and evaluate potential next steps. The agencies and PG&E balanced the data collection necessary with Tribes request to minimize site intrusion by maximizing the use of archived samples and collection of samples from existing locations.

In September 2016, PG&E submitted Data Gap Work Plan #3 that summarizes how archived soil samples will be analyzed, in addition to new samples that will be collected from existing locations and 46 new locations. In October 2016, project stakeholders and Tribal Nations reviewed and discussed the Work Plan, and a site walk was also conducted to view new sample locations. Subsequently, reviewers of the Work Plan provided comments to DTSC and DOI. After consideration of all comments received, DTSC and DOI conditionally approved the Work Plan for field implementation. Field work is scheduled to begin in January 2017. The Data Gap Work Plan #3 can be viewed here.

Due to timing differences in the investigation and reporting of the resulting data, the Final RFI/RI report has been divided into three separate volumes:

  • Volume 1 - Site Background and History
  • Volume 2 – Hydrogeological Characterization and Results of Groundwater and Surface Water Investigation
  • Volume 3 - Soil Characterization Results

Volumes 1 and 2 are discussed in the Groundwater Cleanup – RCRA Facility Investigation/Remedial Investigation pages.

The Volume 3 Report will include the final soil characterization results (including a soil risk assessmentA study prepared to assess health and environmental risks due to potential exposure to hazardous substances.) to complete the RFI/RI requirements for the Site. The first phase of soil investigation in areas outside of the Station was completed in 2008. Soil data have been reviewed, and data gaps have been identified. A Draft Soil RFI/RI Work Plan, which describes the additional data needed to address the identified data gaps at the Site, was prepared and submitted on May 6, 2011. A revised Soil Work Plan was submitted on January 14, 2013, which proposed additional soil investigation for all areas of the Site. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), DTSC evaluated the environmental impacts associated with the soil investigation in the Final Soil EIR. DTSC filed a determination and certified the Final Soil EIR on August 24, 2015 along with the approval of the Final Work Plan. DOI also approved the Soil RFI/RI Work Plan on August 24, 2015. PG&E began the soil field investigation on October 29, 2015; it is anticipated to continue through early 2017. The RFI/RI Volume 3 Report will be prepared thereafter. 

Each approved RFI/RI Volume (and its addendum if applicable) will be released to the public and posted in the Information Repositories and the Document Library
Top

Risk Assessments

To guide decisions based on potential risks to human and ecological health at the Site, PG&E prepared comprehensive Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment Work Plans for soil. The Risk Assessment Work Plan was submitted on August 25, 2008. An addendum was submitted on February 4, 2009. On September 19-20, 2013, DTSC, DOI, PG&E, and Tribal Nations met to discuss amendments to the Soil Risk Assessment Work Plan. A Risk Assessment Work Plan Addendum II was submitted on May 7, 2014, and contains updated information relevant to soil risk assessment activities and evaluation based on comments received by Tribal Nations, agencies, and stakeholders. The Final Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment Work Plan Addendum 2 was submitted on June 29, 2015. DOI approved the Addendum 2 on September 8, 2015 and DTSC approved it on September 15, 2015. The Soil Risk Assessment will be prepared once soil investigation data becomes available.  The risk assessment will provide information about potential human health threats and ecological risks posed by affected soil, and assist risk management decision making on the need for soil remediation. The Soil Risk work is anticipated to begin in 2017.

Top

Protection of Cultural and Biological Resources

The Site is contained within a larger geographic area that is considered sacred by the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe and by other Native American Tribal Nations. DTSC has concluded that the 779.2‐acre Site “appears to qualify as a historic resource under CEQA as an area that is significant in the social and cultural annals of California,” and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) also has determined that a traditional cultural property or property of traditional religious and cultural significance that is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places exists in the area of the Topock Project, within the current Area of Potential Effect, consisting of 1,600 acres of surface area and a section of the Colorado River. Among the larger and better known cultural resources on the Site is an expansive desert geoglyph or intaglio, known as the Topock Maze. 

Prominent historic‐era features in the landscape also overlie the groundwaterWater beneath the Earth’s surface that flows through soil and rock openings (aquifers). plumeA body of contaminated groundwater. The movement of a groundwater plume can be influenced by such factors as local groundwater flow patterns, the character of the aquifer in which the groundwater is contained, and the density of contaminants., include segments of historic U.S. Route 66, the National Trails Highway (also known as the National Old Trails Highway), and the right-of-way of the BNSF Railway. A broad spectrum of archaeological resources is also present within the Project area and on adjacent lands. Properties on and near the Site that are eligible for or listed in the National Register of Historic Places include Native American cultural resources and elements of the historic “built environment.”

For these reasons, all activities at the Station are planned in such a way as to minimize impact to this area. Impacts to cultural and archaeological/historical resources will be minimized by implementing the mitigation measures required by the Programmatic Agreement and the Cultural and Historic Properties Management Plan, and in consultation with Tribal Nations throughout the investigative activities.

A large portion of the Site and surrounding area is the Havasu National Wildlife Refuge. Portions of the Site are also located in a Riparian and Cultural Area of Critical Environmental Concern and the Topock‐Needles Special Cultural Resource Management Area, designated under the BLM Resources Management Plan. Impacts to biological resources will also be minimized by implementing management measures required by the Programmatic Biological Assessment (PBA) and the Avoidance and Minimization Measures required by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

PG&E has also worked closely with biologists to ensure appropriate measures are taken to protect sensitive desert habitat during all aspects of Project implementation. A PBA was completed in January 2007 to cover remediation and investigation projects at the Site up to the final groundwater remedy. On December 27, 2012, the 2007 PBA was modified and extended for 5 years (until 2017). Authorization for the extension and modification of the 2007 PBA can be found here. A new PBA was submitted April 28, 2014, and covers activities related to implementation of the groundwater remedy; it can be found here. For habitat improvement, approximately 400 mesquite trees were planted on the Havasu National Wildlife Refuge and a drip irrigation system was installed to ensure their survival.

Surveys and monitoring to ensure biological and cultural resource protection will continue to be a priority as investigative and remedial activities progress at the Site.
Top